It's 2025, I have to waste my time proving that I thought about things that were pulled off for research and got locked up in psychiatric hospitals to sweep it under the rug. Why do I have to waste my time recovering from damage from a whole bunch of rats. How is this productive? The UK allowed my surveillance and redistributed my things among politically correct individuals who joined BLM and were black. Can you imagine the person organising this? I can already hear her. You will be black, because it's all inclusive - acting like a little boss. It will also be like Star Wars. - "Your situation resonates with me, because I got bullied in school by the cool kids and that guy reminds me of that dude I was into but never noticed me" - *flips her bowl-cut hair* - "I just watched guardians of the galaxy recently and I think you are exactly like that guy. And that girl is literally me." Can you imagine moralfags redistributing someone's entire life based on her moral values? It will include all the current fad movements such as feminism, BLM (in the UK, for whatever reason lmao) "we will beat evil like the chipmunks" In the end they would just end up carrying out an act so horrific that Dr Mengele from the other side just can't stop observing it through his telescope while fondling the tip of his dick. Then the dude just tell them. Have you not wondered about how the human mind was never supposed to receive any input from another if everything was part of a deterministic process? Then they realise that if they killed just one future it would have likely caused a chain reaction that went through entire networks of people and possibly all of humankind. I would be so pleased to hear the moralfagging that tries to explain this away but deep down there would not be many people who would not agree that acts like these should carry a death sentence or a penalty so severe that the "chipmunks" thing and those mediocre comebacks like "that's what we want you to process" will no longer sound any good or hold any relevance. Imagine not getting into Osamu Dazai and thinking that one of the most well known piece of literature in Japanese history was somehow subconscious messaging from a person about the title of the book and not genuine interest in historic pieces from other cultures other than his country of origin. I wanted to get a novel to my girlfriend for christmas because she loved reading and I thought one of the greatest novels from an eastern culture that is about lowlifes and prostitutes, opium addiction, trash relationship with parents or a bad father (all of which that were her things) would maybe interest her. I would have thought this would have been a good story for me to delve into and so would have been for my sociopathic ex. How would a holocaust survivor tell a rwandan genocide survivor that their genocide was exactly 1 point more special than theirs? The issue I've had with these fad movements and groups is that they just keep pushing the boundaries of the sanity of a society they reside in. Destroying someone's source of living would've gotten most of these people killed at any stage in history and now that a state where everyone could remain somewhat civilised they started doing these things that are somewhat legal but also undermines the foundations of these societies. Imagine an ethnicity storming through some major city and smashing every single building and burning everything down. Can you imagine this happening during more medieval times? How would have the military and civilians have acted against these things? Some people had no issues with the jew, it's not the letters 'j-e-w' or the ethnicity itself (it sort of is) but it's also because people lose their livings because they may not think about the holocaust as something special through the lens of historic events. There were events like the plague, the Rwandan genocide or the Hundred Years war where similar proportion of the population have died by being maced to death, stabbed or arrowed down or in the aftermath of their wounds. Some people did not want to be reminded of any mass killings in history or make it the core of their personalities. When people read their history books and saw something like 40 000 or 120 000 deaths they did not think that at the time it could have also happened to be 40% of the population of a country or 90% of all men who were between 16 and 30. Some genuinely think that the world always had a population of 6 or 8 billion and it was just a small sized army that perished. Some people did not own or trade slaves or gassed people they were just brought into the world that already did these things and they may not want these things to be the fight of their lives. There is something to jews that they just can't accept this and some groups are genuinely navigating along the boundaries of what is legal but get's a person destroyed in ways that are way so much worse than having a bad opinion about them. If we have to ingrain genocides into our personalities that resonate with us why can't one make their own choice which genocide they want to resonate with? Somehow the holocaust became this universal genocide everyone can refer to in order to call for actions that often have very severe consequences. As time passes eventually someone will need to come up with an objective and rational reason why absolutely everyone has to internalise the holocaust in particular and adhere to some common consensus that it's something nobody can ridicule, call out, deny, question or research from different angles? What if it was industrialised and what does this even mean? Does it mean that the captive were transported by trains to hubs? How does that make a difference between artificial famines or wars where people bludgeoned each other to death? People like me will never get why the holocaust is so special it just seems like a foundation myth that everyone was supposed to prevent from happening again while simultaneously having all sorts of ethnicities pushing the limits of what host countries can tolerate and once individuals are pushed over their limits they celebrate and treat them as open targets for all sorts of harassment. People got killed for drawing cartoons and their deaths were openly celebrated among first and whatever generation immigrants. Some people do not get the weight of these things even if it's written down. Others want to cope by not thinking about these things ever again but that's also ignoring that the vast majority of civilised countries are on a trajectory where these events can become way much more frequent or even reverse in a way that certain minorities will become majorities and there's all sorts of surveillance systems and organisations that can be completely taken over and utilised to exercise racial vengenance for historic or even recent events that were down to some individuals. Deep down everyone already knows that these will take place eventually and the most diplomatic solution is genuinely for everyone to stay in their own place or keep everything afloat as it is and crack down on the emergence of radical groups. There's these projects though that 'we will fuck your wife or high school sweetheart' or kill your source of living or income if you do wrongthink which all of the above would fall into when perceived or internalised by certain ethnicities or racial groups. Would it be too hard to admit that being racist or having a tribal way of thinking is ancient and accepting that some people don't want to mingle or mix with certain groups is just how they are. That would have been the path of not pushing societies to the border of insanity. Making these things illegal or harassing individuals is just the added component of the paranoia that comes with living in societies that were deemed exceptionally safe compared to others. It just seeped into everything from movies and entertainment even when it comes to porn you have sites probing straights to see if they would masturbate to gay porn. I stopped watching movies because the majority of them was the same theme. Hopefully this changed. The far east has also gone through the process of emperors, dictators and right wing or what can be considered far right by some standards movements. There were massacres that were initiated by views that a certain country is superior to another. Some peoples common view would be that the most superior country on the planet is the US and they could have become racially diverse because there would be moral dilemmas they would not be able to overcome. The dissolution of empires took place because of the common view that nationalism is the future and it resulted in the formation of certain countries. It can also be questioned whether that nationalism took place or has it just become the dissolution of nations by obeying worldviews that promote multi-racial societies. If I create a time series of events that took place since the dissolution of the last european national socialist government did the views that nationalism is the future prevail or was it just an eventual surrender to dissolving borders and ethnic representation of natives. Some people would consider 'Asian' a race - there are also molecular biologists who can make compelling arguments as to how race can be a concept if there are physical differences plus things like lactose intolerance or tolerance or other genetic markers that could form small collections but would be 100% or even just 90% accurate. Either way, what would you think of if you knew td hat there were stories about wars that took place on the far East that involved the genocide of neighboring civilians because they were considered inferior. What if there are iconic works and relics that depict processes like this but they are considered forbidden materials in certain ways. What if it's now as complex or sophisticated as being able to learn from those while also being survaillanced or rumoroured about and if someone goes way too deep into this it can have severe outcomes. What if the response to pressuring dissidents into philosophical obedience was to share objective information in ways that also navigated the borderds of what is legal and can be persecute d for. If we held a fair battle between worldviews then eventually dictatorships and / or national socialism would prevail. it would be an incredibly difficult argument to make but it can be proven through universal truths. What contributions could have certain ethnicities made to human progress? What if others or self investigate this from a spiritual angle and makes a comprehensive list of literature, movies and songs to depict this thing? What if someone barely know everything about other cultures but is aware of a few achievments that are rare to be known about. Would someone know about 'The tragedy of man' or events in Asia that took place such as famines where native bird species may have been culled, exceptional charitability or communal efforts such as giving up on belongings to push to the future of the nation. What if also knowin artists who depict things that were unimaginable to most - such as cities built by artificial intelligence that doesn't take into consideration. What if the architecture of something is looked into because there is something to it and some can sense these things. "Mert a küzdelem a legszentebb, a többi semmiség; és a cél mindig egy lépéssel előbbre, ha elérjük, látjuk, hogy ott a következő, már vár ránk. De a küzdelem örök és végtelen." "The struggle is everything, the rest is nothing. And the goal is always a step ahead; if we reach it, we see that the next is already there, waiting for us. But the struggle itself is eternal and endless." The struggle is the most sacred, the rest is nothingness; and the goal is always one step ahead - once we reach it, we will see that the next one already awaits us. The struggle is Permanent and endless // perpetual and unending - depending on which articulation feels more natural to your vocal chords and which depiction aligns most with your internal senses of worlds. Some Hungarian authors practiced a form of translation of the best pieces of artworks by authors from other nations in ways that changed the meaning of certain phrases that depict the things that the original authors wanted to depict but also expresses it deeper, in the context of the mother-language of a nation. One of the best examples that I came across is Charles Baudelaire's work and Charles Bukowski's translation works. When I was shown the rationale behind translations I realised that there are at least two translation philosophies. One that practices the above and another that functions to preserve the entire meaning of every single phrase or sentence but comes with the cost of reduced emotional response while also leaving some room for accidental, better translations that can originate from a vantage point of differences in pronounciation or the asbcence of certain words or depictors in current dictionaries that are never used in daily interactions. Some words feel off when used in certain situations while some can also be thought to be reserved for use in literature, lectures or speech to audiences. I have a suspicion that some of the most visionary depictions of certain things are not comprehensible to others because of how translation philosophies were applied to certain works. Could it be the case that some artwork cannot naturally be shown because it was translated within commercial frameworks or in such a way that imitates how an archeologist would preserve the fossilised works of nature - by storing and restoring the most amount of detail and with the least amount of information loss in mind. Some sentences and depictions can provoke metaphysical or divine emotional responses in certain minds. There is a translation philosophy that aims to preserve this and would rather sacrifice and prune away atomic blocks of pure information in order to depict this best. Some works in unknown languages can also be depicted purely for the sake of mocking foregin observers of certain works. I wish this happened to me, exclusively, with a great piece of work that targets my internal world against the depiction itself. Works like these could also hold enormous value to someone even if they are malicious in ways that would only be thought of in a state of paranoia. Even if there were works like this, it could be imagined as probing my internal defense mechanisms or an offensive strategy to fight someone's consciousness or way of thinking. and only those who learn hungarian would know but it also happens to one of the most challanging langauges to learn.