The SIAO Office is a referral service that provides support for asylum seekers in France and helps them get in touch with GUDA (Asylum Registration Services). So far in my experience Secours Catholique / Caritas / SIAO have failed to resolve my ongoing struggles with networked harassment and exile. As of this week, the SIAO office have terminated their support for my case. I have questioned this process on ChatGPT to get some quick answers and recommended that I bypass the SIAO office and submit my application directly to OFPRA. I have researched giving up on my citizenship rights and found that Hungary does not allow citizens to become stateless. I find it discriminative that applications for individuals from the middle East and Africa are being taken serious and are actively being processed while citizens of EU countries are dismissed. I may end up pursuing refugee status the other way around and seek asylum in countries where asylum seekers come from to see if these services are reciprocal or not. I have highlighted it to the embassy that I witnessed the ongoing torture of Polish and Hungarian individuals abroad. It seems that they would have not taken my notes serious. I have heard rumours that individuals who torture are justifying mistreatment of foreign nationals for their lack of support of asylum seekers from third world or impoverished countries, however, my case would be different because I oppose the infinite growth and replacement policies of Western nations on the basis that it is clearly unsustainable if it's projected far into the future. There are explanations in these policies that justify mass immigration for the sake of sustaining tax income and pension payments. In my opinion, this would clearly just shift and delay the burden of having to implement reforms that are more sustainable than infinite population growth. There were intentions from governments to raise the retirement age by several years in some EU countries despite the efforts to offset population aging by mass immigration. Individuals tried to frame my reasoning as racism when in reality I would have been an advocate of reforms over unsustainable models that exponentiate these problems for future generations. I personally do not want to see the retirement threshold, education and housing costs increase with no real future solution other than "the generations after us will just deal with these massive demographic shifts that amplify the exact same issue we tried to resolve with it". In my own view this position has nothing to do with racism or injustice and reject being taught a lesson unless someone can entirely contest this view.